Dr. Peter Dreier: Mother Teresa did NOT work for human rights.

Dr. Peter Dreier attempts to make an argument in today’s Huffington Post that Rosa Parks should be part of the “human rights pantheon [with] Bishop [Oscar] Romero and Eleanor Roosevelt,” located at the Washington National Cathedral, but Mother Teresa should not.  His justification is grounded in the distinction between the two women’s approach to their particular cause.  According to Dreier, Parks “believed in justice, not charity” like Mother Teresa.  Therefore, Parks dedicated her life to the “‘struggle to bring equality and social justice to all people’ [while] Mother Teresa raised millions of dollars for her efforts, but never challenged the system that caused such widespread suffering.”  That’s Dreier’s argument at least.

While Dreier says Mother Teresa “deserves praise” for her work, he makes plenty of accusations about horrible conditions for the patients in houses run by the Missionaries of Charity, the order Mother Teresa founded in 1950.  Unfortunately, Dreier doesn’t provide any citations for these; however, a Google search helped me find out Dreier’s source – Wikipedia!  Compare these two paragraphs: the first is from the Wikipedia article (hyperlinks removed) on the Missionaries of Charity under the banner of “controversy;” the second is from Dreier’s article.

Ethics and abortion

This small post will not discuss the ethics of an abortion, but will briefly mention how some pro-choice groups “help” women in paying for their abortions.  For example, The National Network of Abortion Funds helps women pay for abortions by raising money like many charitable organizations do – they host a bowl-a-thon!  If I read their website correctly, it appears they have raised close to half a million dollars for abortions and abortion related costs by hosting bowl-a-thon’s.  I had to do a double take on that.

But The National Network of Abortion Funds admits to their potential clients, they “don’t have the money to cover the entire cost of your abortion, so you’re going to need to come up with some money on your own.”  So, the site offers some recommendations to women, under the banner of “financial counseling,” on how to come up with some of their own money.  The long list tells women to ask :

The power of The Word

From St. Justin Martyr’s Discourse to the Greeks:


Henceforth, you Greeks, come and partake of incomparable wisdom, and be instructed by the Divine Word, and acquaint yourselves with the King immortal; and do not recognise those men as heroes who slaughter whole nations.

For our own Ruler, the Divine Word, who even now constantly aids us, does not desire strength of body and beauty of feature, nor yet the high spirit of earth’s nobility, but a pure soul, fortified by holiness, and the watchwords of our King, holy actions, for through the Word power passes into the soul.

O trumpet of peace to the soul that is at war!

O weapon that puttest to flight terrible passions!

O instruction that quenches the innate fire of the soul!

The Word exercises an influence which does not make poets: it does not equip philosophers nor skilled orators, but by its instruction it makes mortals immortal, mortals gods; and from the earth transports them to the realms above Olympus.

USCCB: Disciples Called to Witness

The following is the preface to the USCCB’s new document entitled, Disciples Called to Witness: The New Evangelization.  The document, published by the Committee on Evangelization and Catechesis, asks Catholics, “How often do we fail to realize that we are called to be Christ’s witnesses to the world?”


Christ commands us to be his witnesses to the ends of the earth. We are to proclaim his Good News to all people, everywhere and at all times. After Christ promises the disciples that the Holy Spirit will come upon them, he ascends into heaven. The disciples, rather than heeding Christ’s command to be his witnesses, stare “intently at the sky.” It takes “two men dressed in white garments” asking, “Men of Galilee, why are you . . . looking at the sky?” for the disciples to begin to realize the meaning of Christ’s command (Acts 1:10-11).

How often do we fail to realize that we are called to be Christ’s witnesses to the world? Do we realize that our Baptism, Confirmation, and reception of the Eucharist bestow on us the grace we need to be disciples? Are we like the disciples staring at the sky rather than inviting those around us to experience Christ’s love and mercy through the Church? How often do we reach out to our missing brothers and sisters by inviting them to join us at Mass or by asking why they no longer feel welcomed at the Lord’s Table? The answers to these questions underlie the evangelizing mission of the Church, especially in the call of the New Evangelization.

The future of the LCWR

The following is the beginning of George Weigel’s article, The Vatican and the Sisters, originally published in National Review Online on April 23, 2012.


In Chariots of Fire, two of the elders of Cambridge University invite the young Jewish runner Harold Abrahams to a formal, black-tie luncheon, during which they try to dissuade the upstart undergraduate from using a professional trainer to prepare for the forthcoming Paris Olympics. Abrahams declines to follow Oxbridge athletic orthodoxy and leaves in something of a huff. The Master of Trinity (brilliantly played by John Gielgud) sighs and says to the Master of Caius, “Another God, another mountaintop.”

It’s a scene worth keeping in mind when parsing the recent Vatican decision to take into a form of ecclesiastical receivership the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, the umbrella association that represents the majority of American orders of sisters. On April 18, after years of study, the Holy See appointed Archbishop J. Peter Sartain of Seattle to oversee the LCWR’s activities, supervise the LCWR’s adherence to the Church’s liturgical norms, review its links to affiliated organizations like the political advocacy group “Network,” and guide a revision of the LCWR’s statutes. Sartain will be assisted by Bishop Thomas Paprocki of Springfield, Ill. (appropriately enough, a veteran ice-hockey goalie used to taking hard shots), and Bishop Leonard Blair of Toledo (whose theological analysis of the LCWR’s activities over the past decade shaped the decision to appoint Sartain as the Holy See’s delegate in charge of the LCWR).

Biblical interpretation – cartoon

Click to expand

Primacy of Conscience misinterpreted

One of the things most commonly heard when it comes to issues of morality and Catholicism is individual Catholics saying, “I must follow my conscience.”

Some Catholics, acting contrary to a particular Church teaching (e.g. artificial birth control, abortion, support for gay marriage) believe, erroneously, they are acting in accordance with Church teaching by following their individual conscience. This is commonly referred to as the “primacy of conscience.” First, I will tell you how erring Catholics understand primacy of conscience:

The Church offers guidance on how to live, but since I am so in tune with God, I can sense (feel, interpret, judge) God’s will for me and do not need to follow the Church’s teachings on _(insert teaching here)_. By disobeying the Church’s teaching on ______, I am actually obeying the Church’s teaching to follow my conscience.  It even says in the Catechism of the Catholic Church: “Conscience is a judgment of reason whereby the human person recognizes the moral quality of a concrete act that he is going to perform, is in the process of performing, or has already completed. In all he says and does, man is obliged to follow faithfully what he knows to be just and right. It is by the judgment of his conscience that man perceives and recognizes the prescriptions of the divine law” (CCC 1778). So therefore, my conscience grants me insight into “the prescriptions of the divine law” so I have to follow it.

USCCB Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty: Our First, Most Cherished Liberty

The following is the beginning of a document release by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops on April 12, 2012.  A link for the whole document will be provided below.


We are Catholics. We are Americans. We are proud to be both, grateful for the gift of faith which is ours as Christian disciples, and grateful for the gift of liberty which is ours as American citizens. To be Catholic and American should mean not having to choose one over the other. Our allegiances are distinct, but they need not be contradictory, and should instead be complementary. That is the teaching of our Catholic faith, which obliges us to work together with fellow citizens for the common good of all who live in this land. That is the vision of our founding and our Constitution, which guarantees citizens of all religious faiths the right to contribute to our common life together.

Freedom is not only for Americans, but we think of it as something of our special inheritance, fought for at a great price, and a heritage to be guarded now. We are stewards of this gift, not only for ourselves but for all nations and peoples who yearn to be free. Catholics in America have discharged this duty of guarding freedom admirably for many generations.

Book Review: Judie Brown’s The Broken Path

Judie Brown, President of the American Life League (ALL), recently published a bold book entitled, The Broken Path: How Catholic Bishops Got Lost in the Weeds of American Politics (2011).  In the interest of full disclosure, I was contacted by the ALL and asked if I would be willing to read and review the book.  My only compensation was a free copy of the book.

Ms. Brown has been a staunch pro-life advocate for over 30 years and has been appointed to The Pontifical Academy for Life three times, by both Blessed John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI.  Her credentials in the advancement of pro-life causes are without question and she is rightly regarded as one of the pioneers in the quest to end the murder of unborn children.

I originally picked up Ms. Brown’s book in the second week of January to read it; however, different pressures at work and school prevented me from actually doing it.  Instead, I read it over the past two months as the drama between the Obama administration and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) was reaching a fever pitch.  As part of President Obama’s national health care plan, The United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a mandate on January 20th requiring Catholic organizations to provide sterilization, contraception, and abortifacient drugs in their health care plans.  Essentially, the religious freedom clause allowing religious organizations to refuse providing these services was removed.  Now, anyone even remotely familiar with the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church knows these services and drugs are directly opposed by the Church’s teachings.  To require Church organizations to provide, and pay for, these services is an absolute slap in the face.

2012 URBI ET ORBI of Pope Benedict XVI

The following is Pope Benedict’s 2012 URBI ET ORBI address (source).


Dear Brothers and Sisters in Rome and throughout the world!

“Surrexit Christus, spes mea” – “Christ, my hope, has risen” (Easter Sequence).

May the jubilant voice of the Church reach all of you with the words which the ancient hymn puts on the lips of Mary Magdalene, the first to encounter the risen Jesus on Easter morning. She ran to the other disciples and breathlessly announced: “I have seen the Lord!” (Jn 20:18). We too, who have journeyed through the desert of Lent and the sorrowful days of the Passion, today raise the cry of victory: “He has risen! He has truly risen!”

Every Christian relives the experience of Mary Magdalene. It involves an encounter which changes our lives: the encounter with a unique Man who lets us experience all God’s goodness and truth, who frees us from evil not in a superficial and fleeting way, but sets us free radically, heals us completely and restores our dignity. This is why Mary Magdalene calls Jesus “my hope”: he was the one who allowed her to be reborn, who gave her a new future, a life of goodness and freedom from evil. “Christ my hope” means that all my yearnings for goodness find in him a real possibility of fulfilment: with him I can hope for a life that is good, full and eternal, for God himself has drawn near to us, even sharing our humanity. 


Hit Counter provided by Seo Packages

Switch to our mobile site